Justice for Bill

The Baez Law Firm

The Baez Law Firm
Trucking Lawyers and Accident Lawyers

Cheap Texas Divorce

Cheap Texas Divorce
Home of the $149 Divorce in Texas

Search the Web

Monday, November 12, 2012

Find San Antonio Lawyers that handle taser cases by Police

Our Law Firm has handle thousands of cases for our clients that include injury. Our Lawyers have been selected as Super Lawyers in the areas of personal injury, including police brutality, family law and business law. We have tried multiple cases to juries in Texas and we have been successful.

Many lawyers do not handle police brutality cases, specially those that involve taser by police simply because they are difficult and costly. Our Law Firm does not back away from this type of cases. In fact, we are one of the only Law Firms in San Antonio that, other lawyers refer their § 1983 cases.

Why have we been so successful? Because we handle pre-trial, trial and appeal if necessary. Many lawyers cannot. So, in the event that a love one has been injured, killed or attacked by a police officer, give The Baez Law Firm a call.

Our Top Lawyer are here for you. We pride in the fact that we are: “Minimizing Legal Worries!”℠ If your love one has been injured by a bad cop, we are here for you. We have top experts in the field that can testify that a cop's actions were unreasonable and thus a police brutality case is present. To win in court, you need experts on your side.

There is only one place to go when your love one has been injured by a police. The Baez Law Firm has relocated to Suite 500 in the same building since we had to hire more lawyers to help our clients. Give us a call (210) 979-9777.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Criminal Defense Cases, we got your back!

Our San Antonio Lawyers have been handling criminal defense with a combined experience of over 20 years and over 300 criminal defense trials. We have represented clients on murder cases, assault cases, DWI and DUI cases, felonies, drug charges and many more.

We have a former prosecutor as one of our attorneys, so we know the tricks of the trade. We have a sophisticated defense preparation team and system that allows our clients to be put through a trial, without the risk of incarceration. Based on this risk assessment, we can advise our client as to whether a trial it the best choice.

Our Trial Experts have been recognized all over the nation for their work in forencic evidence and the like. We do not go to trial unprepared. If you have been accused of a crime in San Antonio, you need to contact The Báez Law Firm ASAP.

We see time and time again that people go to court unrepresented or unprepared. We will not be! Our Top Crimial Lawyers and Criminal Defense Attorneys will fight for your freedom. Give us a call, your initial consultation is always free.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Our client gets a $1.3 million judgment against Skyco

Judgment for $1.3 million

PRESS RELEASE!
On Friday, June 29, 2012, a judgment was obtained by The Baez Law Firm from San Antonio Texas,  against Skyco Inc. an equipment company from Florida. The judgment was obtained based on Skyco's misrepresentations fraud and deceptive practices here in Texas.

The judgment was awarded to Pannel Construction Co. a Texas company that purchased equipment from Skyco. Pannel Construction is one of many clients of the firm, that we have help recover damages for their injuries here in Texas.

We represent people, businesses and others in Texas on multiple issues including litigation and trial, appeals, and many more. If you are in need of business representation, or have litigation issues, give us a call. If your company has been damaged, give us a call.
When any company does business over the internet in Texas, they can be held liable to a Texas jury for any damages that they may cause to either an individual or a company in Texas. This is called availing themselves to a Texas forum. If you thing that a company is doing you or your business wrong, give us a call.

We have been selected as Super Lawyers by our peers because of our success and commitment to our clients and their cases.

Out of State companies doing businesses in Texas, either over the internet or mail, and make misrepresentation to a Texas company or individual, and a contract is entered into, those out of State companies will be held liable in Texas for their wrongs.

Congratulations to Pannel Construction Co. for the judgment obtained yesterday against Skyco. It has been a long process but it had its rewards. We have been honored to have represented you during this entire litigation. This is why we say, "we care about your legal needs!"

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Divorce

There are grounds in Texas, including insupportability for a divorce. Our Law Firm is familiar with those grounds, and here is some research on the law on some of the grounds.

Under Const. art. 5, § 8, relating to divorce, legislature is given complete authority over matter of providing for divorce actions and necessarily has full authority not only to prescribe all "grounds" for securing a divorce, but may also prescribe any "qualifications" which it declares a petitioner must have before seeking relief in the state courts. Pappas v. Pappas (Civ.App. 1941) 146 S.W.2d 1115.

State Legislature has broad power to regulate and thereby change conditions for obtaining a divorce by its residents. Hopkins v. Hopkins (Civ.App. 1976) 540 S.W.2d 783.

This section does not violate due process. Saltarelli v. Saltarelli (App. 2 Dist. 1984) 670 S.W.2d 785.

"No-fault" divorce statute did not violate Establishment Clause or Free Exercise Clause, despite claim that terms "reconciliation" and "legitimate ends of marriage" were objectively religious; trial court was not asked to make a religious determination, but rather to determine whether continuance of marriage relation had been rendered intolerable to the other party, and was productive of no possible benefit to society. Waite v. Waite (App. 14 Dist. 2001) 64 S.W.3d 217, review denied, stay denied, rehearing of petition for review denied.

"No-fault" divorce statute did not violate state "right of conscience" constitutional guarantee, despite claim that terms "reconciliation" and "legitimate ends of marriage" were objectively religious. Id.

"No-fault" divorce statute did not violate "free institutions" clause of State Constitution; marriage was not one of the institutions contemplated by the clause, rather, language "free institutions" referred to institutions of state government necessary to ensure right of local self-government. Id.


"No-fault" divorce statute did not violate "open courts" provision of State Constitution by abolishing defense of recrimination; provision did not apply to suits for divorce, which were not common law causes of action, but were statutorily created and regulated proceedings. Id.


Term "suit for divorce", relates to particular class of suits for causes arising after marriage. McDade v. McDade (Civ.App. 1929) 16 S.W.2d 304.

Statutory grounds for divorce should be strictly construed. Buckner v. Buckner (Civ.App. 1930) 27 S.W.2d 311.

Divorce statutes should be strictly construed. Woody v. Woody (Civ.App. 1963) 371 S.W.2d 576.
Wife's argument that application of no-fault divorce law had deprived her, without due process, of vested personal property rights in marital estates, namely, the medical benefits to which she was entitled to as the wife of a retired air force officer was without basis, since record did not reflect that wife had not been afforded adequate notice or a fair hearing. Hopkins v. Hopkins (Civ.App. 1976) 540 S.W.2d 783.


There is no distinction as to right of state to regulate marriage and divorce between marriages performed in church by minister and those performed outside church by a judge, and thus this section was constitutionally applied to Christian marriage performed in church by a minister based on husband's testimony and court's finding that marriage had become insupportable because of discord and conflict of personalities and that there was no reasonable expectation of any reconciliation. Trickey v. Trickey (App. 2 Dist. 1982) 642 S.W.2d 47, dismissed.

It was intent of legislature to make decree of divorce mandatory when party to marriage alleges insupportability and establishes statutory elements, regardless of who is at fault, and as such, when dissolution of marriage is sought solely on ground of insupportability, evidence of fault becomes irrelevant as analytical construct and may not be considered by trial court in its just and right division of community estate. Phillips v. Phillips (App. 9 Dist. 2002) 75 S.W.3d 564.

Purpose of legislature in enacting this section was to abolish necessity of presenting sordid and ugly details of conduct on the part of either spouse in order to obtain a decree of divorce. Baxla v. Baxla (Civ.App. 1975) 522 S.W.2d 736.

It is not error for a Texas court rendering a decree of divorce to apply the no-fault divorce law of Texas although the marriage dissolved was celebrated in a sister state and the law of the sister state at time of marriage did not provide for no-fault divorce. Hopkins v. Hopkins (Civ.App. 1976) 540 S.W.2d 783.

In divorce suit, court did not err in applying new no fault divorce law (this section), despite contention that law in effect at time of marriage in sister state should be applied in determining right to divorce. Smitheal v. Smitheal (Civ.App. 1975) 518 S.W.2d 842, dismissed w.o.j., certiorari denied 96 S.Ct. 277, 423 U.S. 928, 46 L.Ed.2d 256.

In divorce suit, even if the court applied wrong law in determining whether husband was entitled to divorce, prejudicial error was not shown, where wife also asked to be divorced and urged grounds which were grounds for divorce under old law, court granted wife divorce and also granted husband a "no fault" divorce which also terminated marriage. Id.

Decree of divorce is absolute in Texas from its entry, unless set aside or appealed from, so that a provision in decree in Oklahoma, where it is not shown that the law of that state is to the contrary, that the decree shall not be absolute until six months after entry is of no effect in Texas. Vickers v. Faubion (Civ.App. 1920) 224 S.W. 803.

If you cannot afford an attorney, use our website Cheap Texas Divorce for your divorce.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Have a criminal case in San Antonio? Our criminal defense lawyers can help!

The Baez Law Firm has been named in the Super Lawyers for 2012. We help people in the area of criminal law, because we understand what it takes for aggressive legal representation in court. The District Attorneys Office has top lawyers working for them, and so should you!

A well prepared legal team brings the client into the action, and that is what we do. We focus our defense on truth and honesty. We have helped thousands of people with their criminal defense in San Antonio Courts. Do go to court unrepresented.

When you need an attorney in San Antonio for your criminal defense case, you need the experience and knowledge of The Baez Law Firm. We are here for you. Whether you have a DWI, assault, drug charge, weapons, murder, white collar crimes, or any criminal charge against you, we can help.

Have a criminal appeal, we can help too. So, what are you waiting for. Give us a call (210) 979-9777. We will give your case the importance that it deserves.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Our tool bar for Cheap Texas Divorce

We own Cheap Texas Divorce and we have created a tool bar so that our customers are able to follow us, write us or simply like us.

Want to download it, here it is: Cheap Texas Divorce Tool Bar

Enjoy it!

Monday, May 28, 2012

Need a simple divorce in San Antonio, our lawyers can help!

Many people are going through a divorce in San Antonio, but they do not know where to start. Many times, people go to the court house and purchase a kit for their divorces. Although we do not say it cannot be done, many times you need someone to handle the divorce for you. Our San Antonio Lawyers, Attorneys and Law Firm are here for you to help you with your divorce.

We are having a special on divorces this month. If you call us (210) 979-9777 and state that you saw this post on our blog, and you need a simple divorce, we will help you for a flat fee. We are doing this to help people in San Antonio with divorces. Do not do it alone if you don't have to. Let our Super Lawyer in San Antonio help you!

We also have a website to help you in San Antonio with divorces but you cannot afford an attorney. We created Cheap Texas Divorce to help those who cannot afford a lawyer but need a divorce, and the divorce is a simple one. This is a do it yourself divorce.

So, what are you waiting for? Give us a call today!!!

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Legal issues in San Antonio, we are here to help!

Our San Antonio Law Firm has helped people in the San Antonio area with their legal needs, in all areas of law. We handle personal injury, family law, business law, criminal law, divorces, appeals, litigation and many many more areas of law for our clients. Our San Antonio lawyers do this knowing that legal problems are not easy to overcome, but with time and experience, our clients always get their legal problems solved.

For example, here are some of the examples of how we helped our clients yesterday. We settled  two personal injury claims, got custody of the child of our client, helped a mom get child support, performed discovery in a litigation case for our client, set a case for trial on the merits, and made an appearance on our clinet's behalf in a criminal case.

We are able to do this because we have top lawyers and attorneys in San Antonio that care about your legal needs.  Our super lawyers know the law, and they use this for the advantage of our clients. When you have a legal problem in San Antonio, our law firm can help you get the legal representation that you deserve.

Come see us, and you will know the difference from the moment that you walk through our doors. Your initial consultation is always free! Don't wait any longer for your legal problem to grow, give us a call today (210) 979-9777.

When you cannot afford an attorney or a lawyer in Texas, but need a divorce, Cheap Texas Divorce is here for you! Powered by The Baez Law Firm.

Friday, May 4, 2012

For years, courts have had a lot of discretion, when it comes to the "best interest" of the child in family cases for custody determination in Texas. Litigants have to be prepare to explain to the court why it would be in the best interest of the child, to be with one parent over the other one. In most cases, it is not an easy task to do, since both parents are involved with the care of the child.

A Supreme Court of Texas case gave us some guidelines, as to what the courts may look at. In this case, the court looked at these factors: (A) the desires of the child; (B) the emotional and physical needs of the child now and in the future; (C) the emotional and physical danger to the child now and in the future; (D) the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody; (E) the programs available to assist these individuals to promote the best interest of the child; (F) the plans for the child by these individuals or by the agency seeking custody; (G) the stability of the home or proposed placement; (H) the acts or omissions of the parent which may indicate that the existing parent-child relationship is not a proper one; and (I) any excuse for the acts or omissions of the parent. Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1976).


The court also said that: "This listing is by no means exhaustive, but does indicate a number of considerations which either have been or would appear to be pertinent." We take this list, and make it pertinent to our client's cases.

If you, or someone you know is facing a divorce, custody battle, child support issues, family issues, give us a call (210) 979-9777. Our San Antonio Lawyers have been helping families with their family legal issues successfully.

If you cannot afford a lawyers on your divorce, Cheap Texas Divorce can help you!

Monday, April 30, 2012

Sample Brief on Motion to Reconsider filed by our San Antonio Family Lawyers

MOTION TO RECONSIDER RESPONDENT’S PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION

This Motion to Reconsider Respondent’s Plea to the Jurisdiction is brought by PARTY, Respondent, who shows in support:

1. On DATE, this Court heard Respondent’s Plea to the Jurisdiction which was entered and signed on DATE.

(A) This Court Ruled that Respondent’s Plea to the Jurisdiction was denied but it further ordered that when certified copies of pleadings from the Mexican Tribunal

        (1) a court of this State determines that neither the child, the child’s parents,(emphasis added) and any person acting as a parent do not have a significant connection with this State and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this State concerning the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationship; or

         (2) a court of this State or a court of another state determines that the child, the child’s parents, (emphasis added) and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this State."

2. The child, the subject of the suit resides in Texas and has resided in Texas for the past four years. Respondent (one of the parents of the child) resides in Texas, and has never resided in Illinois. Substantial evidence is no longer available in this State concerning the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationship. The State that has substantial evidence concerning the child’s care, protection, training and relationship is Texas, not Illinois. The child goes to school in Texas. The child’s friends are in Texas. The child’s family is in Texas. The child’s child support is monitored by Texas.

3. Respondent is not amendable to process in this State pursuant 735 ILCS 5/2-213 (b). Respondent has not waived his objection that "defendant who waives service of a summons in the manner provided in subsection (a) does not thereby waive any objection to the venue or to the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the defendant." Moreover, Respondent has not submitted himself to this States jurisdiction pursuant 735 ILCS 5/2-209, since none of the grounds to exercise jurisdiction over him are present.

Respondent prays that: (1) the Clerk set this matter for hearing, (2) the Court dismiss this case without prejudice as provided for by 750 ILCS 22/204(b), 735 ILCS 5/2-209, 750 ILC 36/101 ,and 735 ILCS 5/2-213 (b).

Our Lawyers have practice in other states and can help you with your legal disputes in other states as well. Have a legal problem? Give us a call (210) 979-9777. We care about your legal needs!

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Top Young Attorneys in Texas

Attorney Edgardo R. Baez from The Baez Law Firm, P.C .has been selected as one of the Top Young Attorneys in Texas Rising Stars as the article will be published in the Texas Monthly in April 2012.

Mr. Baez was selected by peer recognition and professional achievements. Mr. Baez was also selected by Super Lawyers in three practice areas: Personal Injury, Family Law and Business Litigation in March of 2012.

"I am humbled and honored to received such wonderful recognitions. This proves that we have been doing the right thing for our clients"

Whether your need is in Personal Injury, Business Law, Family Law or Criminal Law, The Baez Law Firm is here to help you with your legal needs.

Have you been a victim of an accident, or need legal representation, The Baez Law Firm is here to give you the representation that you deserve.

Come see us, and you will know the difference from the moment that you walk through our doors. Your initial consultation is always free.

Read Mr. Baez profile on Super Lawyers here:

http://www.superlawyers.com/texas/lawyer/Edgardo-R-Baez/d944125f-996b-4d14-84a8-3040cce97ac1.html

Monday, March 12, 2012

Do you have our new accident applications?

We have been helping injured victims in San Antonio for some time. We know the ins and outs of the insurance industry. When it comes to accidents, you need to be prepared. This is why our web developers have prepared our accident applications.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/auto-accident-tools-for-san/id479898316?mt=8

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.BAEZ

These applications are FREE!!!

Use them because its better to have them and not need them, than to need them and not have them!

We care about your legal needs!

Friday, March 9, 2012

Divorce is never easy, and we understand it!

Have you ever heard the phrase...See one, Do one, Teach one? When it comes to family law and divorces in San Antonio, we understand it. Since our attorneys not only see divorces but also have lived through them, they can teach the public and more importantly, litigate one for our clients successfully.
In Texas, divorces are very common. Each divorce is very painful. To understand a divorce, an attorney must empathise with the client and know where that client is coming from. Our San Antonio Family Lawyers understand what you are going through as a divorcee, and can and will empathise with your situation.
Many times, our lawyers do not have to get involved with a divorce. If the divorce is a simple uncontested divorce, we sent our clients to one of